Nuclear Bill – deciphering the “and” gesture

aburmanAugust 20, 2010June 19, 2013Lawatomic energy, civil liability for nuclear bill, constitution of India, democracy, government, india as an evolving polity, india bill nuclear liability, india policy blog, Indian parliament, indian polity, indo us nuclear deal, liability of operator, liability of supplier, Lok Sabha, nuclear deal, nuclear power, Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Environment and Forests, politics, politics in India, politics of india, polity in india, polityinindia, power plant, recourse against supplier, right of recourse, subbarami committee, subbirami committee, supplier nuclear material, suppliers of nuclear fuel

A number of newspapers have carried stories on the presence of a mysterious “and” in one of the provisions in the Nuclear Liability Bill. I have put up a post on my office blog –

Parliament’s Recommendations on the Nuclear Liability Bill – Why the “and”?

The blog discusses the implications of what the insertion of a single innocuous word can mean.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Anirudh Burman's Page

Anirudh Burman's Page

Mainstream Weekly

Anirudh Burman's Page

Scholars without Borders

Anirudh Burman's Page

Anirudh Burman's Page

LAW RESOURCE INDIA

LEGAL RESOURCE CENTRE / COURT JUDGMENTS / LEGAL ARCHIVES

KAFILA - COLLECTIVE EXPLORATIONS SINCE 2006

DISSENT, DEBATE, CREATE

Anirudh Burman's Page

Concurring Opinions

Anirudh Burman's Page

Anirudh Burman's Page

Law and Other Things

Anirudh Burman's Page

indian journalism review

%d bloggers like this: